Teens Driving Cars
Advice, discussions, and reviews from the
Parents of Teens weekly email newsletter.
Berkeley Parents Network >
Advice >
Teenagers >
Teens Driving Cars
December 2006
Are parents just not informed or are they deliberately
ignoring the provisional license restriction? Teen drivers
under 18 are not allowed to drive with their friends
without an adult driver in the car for a year. (It used
to be 6 months but as of 1/1/06 it went up to a year.)
They are also not allowed to drive past 11 p.m. as of
1/1/06.
But time and again I see new drivers transporting their
young friends (not within the parameters of
the exceptions to the provision) and what amazes me is
that they do it with their parents permission. Im even
told by parents that they believe their teen driver
is safer with a companion! Or what can I do? Theyre
going to do it anyway.
While I know its not easy to enforce completely, but if
all parents toed the line of the law it would certainly be
easier. Technically the cops could issue a fine of $35 to
$50 and 16-24 hours community service, but apparently that
is not being enforced even at that minor level (and all
the kids know it.)
CA made this law to save lives. Parents who are allowing
their teen to violate this law is beyond reason to me
this goes for both the driving teens and the ones allowed
to be passengers. Will we as a community have to
experience a serious accident or death to have it hit
home? Weve spent sixteen years keeping our kids safe in
cumbersome car seats and seatbelts, when Im sure many of
us grew up without such precautions when we got into cars.
Why stop short of the goal of keeping our teens safe now?
What do other parents think?
Am I the only one that feels this way?
You are not the only one to follow the law, and I encourage you to do
so no matter what anyone else does or says (we grownups are above peer
pressure, right?). My daughter didn't get her license until 17 1/2, so by 18 she was just
about ready to drive with company.... she did drive her friends a
couple of times before she was 18, but I'm not meant to know that ---- and she
did so in a manner so cautious that I would likely not have found out, if her
friends didn't leave trash in the car. I was also annoyed when one of my kids
rode with a friend. It was my policy to call the parents of my daughter's
friends and mention that my kid had gotten a ride home, or I'd seen their kid
driving, and didn't realize s/he'd had her/his license long enough. Half of them
responded, half didn't.
For me the hardest moment was putting her in a car with a less
experienced, but 18 year old driver. In Berkeley, where busses are an option, there are very
few good excuses to drive illegally, at 16 or 17.
As for parents who let there kids break this law for the most common
reasons (tired of having the argument, don't want to drive the kids yourself) I
have very little respect for them. In the case of my kids' friends... I
don't think their teenagers have much respect for them either.
By the way -- the next thing that happens is that they all want to be
the one to drive the group, except when they are going out to party...when they
suddenly all want to ride instead. I was always (secretly) happy to
see they were ''designating'' drivers...but would rather none of them was
drinking illegally, either. I could never prove anything was going on, and now
they are all off in college....
Be strong. Your insistence is what gives your kid the ''excuse'' to do
the right thing, when friends are urging her to do something else
Anonymous for Kids' Sake
My kid IS following the law, but I have to say I find it
ridiculous. She's had her license for 6 months now and is a
careful driver. The fact that she can't drive a friend means
that essentially she doesn't drive very much. This means
that it's going to be another six months before she drives
frequently, by which point she will be one year from what
she learned in driver's training. I don't really see how
this is going to be helpful. I DO agree with waiting 6
months to drive friends. I wouldn't mind if she couldn't
drive after 11 until she's 21. But I do think that after
having her license for 6 months, she should be allowed to
drive friends around. But she isn't
Law-abiding but resentful
I have heard that your insurance company may not pay a claim if you are
violating this law. This could have horrendous consequences
teen driver parent
January 6, 2006
For those who haven't alread heard, there are two important
changes to California's provisional driver's license rules
as of Jan. 1, 2006. These apply to ALL drivers under the
age of 18, including those who already have their license.
So some kids will have to stop carrying teen passengers now,
even if they could legally do so before.
1. Prohibits a provisional licensee from carrying passengers
under the age of 20, unless accompanied by a licensed
parent/guardian, licensed/certified instructor or a licensed
driver 25 years of age or older, during the first 12 months
(formerly six months) the driver is licensed .
2. Prohibits a provisional licensee from driving between the
hours of 11 p.m. and 5 a.m. (formerly 12 midnight and 5 a.m.).
R.K.
Jan 2006
Is it true that the new law that just came into force
prohibiting teens from driving for 12 months post-license
with those under 20 in the car, unless a licensed adult of
at last 25 is in the car, applies to teens who already had
their license? My understanding is that the new law applies
only to those who get their licences from now on, not those
who got their licences last fall or summer.
Am I wrong?
Dianna
see http://www.dmv.ca.gov/dl/dl_info.htm#FIRSTYEAR
Yes, it's true and it is retroactive to Jan. 1, 2005 for
provisional license holders.
January 13, 2006
Help! The January 6 Parents of Teens newsletter advised that
tougher ''graduated licensing'' restrictions on new drivers
became effective on January 1st. Previously, new license
holders under age 18 were restricted from driving with
passengers under age 20 for the first six months after
obtaining a license; now it is for the first 12 months, and
applies retroactively to licenses issued since January 1, 2005.
Plenty of data show that these laws have reduced teen
accidents; they're designed to increase everyone's safety.
In the Newsletter archives on this topic (when the
restriction was six months), nearly every writer lamented
that some parents ignore teen driver laws and strenuously
urged every parent to help enforce them.
Well, we just learned that our teen has been riding with a
friend who has been licensed for only seven months and,
since January 1, is breaking the new law -- with her
parents' permission. When (genuinely shocked) I questioned
the parent, he seemed surprised and offended that I objected
to our daughter being driven illegally by his.
Are my concerns misplaced? (1) That our daughter knew her
friend was no longer legal to be driving her but didn't
bring it to our attention, and (2) That this family did not
ask us whether we were comfortable with the situation. It
may be their prerogative, I guess, to flout public policy
and allow their teen to drive illegally but is it their
prerogative to involve other teens without the explicit
permission of their parents -- without respecting other
families' safety concerns and rules for their own children?
Our teen is just beginning the process of getting her
learner's permit, and it seems the first messages she's
gotten are: ''Teens are competent to decide for themselves
what's safe to do'' and ''The risks and consequences of
illegal driving are no big deal'' and ''It's OK to disobey
annoying laws that impose temporary inconveniences.''
Am I off-base for feeling side-swiped, so to speak, or what?
I'd love to hear other parents' thoughts and experiences.
SPM
Over the years my spouse and I have found ourselves at
odds with the parents of some of our daughters (we have 3)
friends. And we have many times found ourselves surprised
by the degree of latitude some of the parents allow their
children. It took a while, but we finally learned that we
cannot ask or demand that other parents live by our
values, but we can limit our childrens access to those
situations we consider unacceptable.
What does that mean? That means that until our kids were
legally able to take riders and accept rides according to
the law, we did the driving. That if we did not want our
children in particular places without chaperones we went
with them or they didn't go. Simply said, if you have an
issue, a value, and opinion etc, you have the
responsibility to take care of it and cannot ask another
parent to take on that responsibility.
More - we always talked to our kids about our concerns and
values, we tried to blend into the woodwork, and we
acknowledged their frustration. Finally, we told them,
and meant it, that we would pick them up any time, any
place without question, and reserved the right and
responsibility to discuss the situation later. The funny
thing about that is that we ended up picking up our kids
as well as their friends on numerous occasions when they
found themselves in uncomfortable situations or felt
unsafe.
So, talk to your child about your rules and values, listen
to her and come to some mutually acceptable agreements,
but also take responsibility for enforcing your rules
yourself.
Carolyn
I think you know the answer to your own questions. Don't
second guess yourself. It makes my blood boil how special
and justified many people seem to feel these days in
breaking all sorts of traffic laws. They exist for a
reason. When people break these laws or allow their kids
to they're helping to create/perpetuate a dangerous
driving climate. Protect your daughter (and others) -
you're the one who sends the strongest messages to her in
her life and perhaps you'll be sending one to her friend
vicariously. I personally believe your daughter should
receive some sort of consequence for being caught in this
situation as well. My son, now 20, was caught in
something similar when he was 17 and we took away his
driving privileges for a certain period of time.
Hard-nosed mother on the topic of driving laws
I feel for you. Yes, you were ''sideswiped''. Different
families have different values. As a parent all we can do is
communicate this to our offspring. You find out who some of
your associates are as you see how they manage their families.
It can be enlightening!
a Mom
January 27, 2006
I want to know what is the consequence of violating the law
requiring no under-aged person in the car for 1 year? My
daughter keeps insisting that she will ride with her friend
anyway, that ''no one'' follows that rule, especially if they
already are past the 6 mo. We are holding to the rule and
will deal with her directly if we find out, but I'm curious
what exactly happens to the driver when they get stopped
and found out to be breaking the law?? ticket? license
suspended?? I want to be able to talk to my daughter's
friend and her parents about what she is risking by doing
this.
Parent of 16 yr old non-driver
Replying to the parent who asked: I want to know what is the
consequence of violating the law requiring no under-aged
person in the car for 1 year?
Here's what the DMV website says:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/brochures/fast_facts/ffdl19.htm
Provisional Driver License Sanctions: Currently a 30-day
restriction is required if your driver record shows a
violation point count of two or more points in 12 months.
A six-month suspension and a one-year term of probation
shall be imposed if your driver record shows a violation
point count of three or more points in 12 months. Also, the
court is required to impose community service hours or fines
for violation of specific provisions.
NOTE: Probation means: no tickets, no accidents, and any
current restriction or suspension will run its full term
even if you turn 18 before the restriction or suspension ends.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/dl/vioptct.htm
A one-point violation includes: Violation of License
Restrictions: 14603 VC. No person shall operate a vehicle
in violation of the provisions of a restricted license
issued to him.
Somewhere I read that police cannot stop a kid for this
violation UNLESS the driver has already committed (or is
suspected of) some other infraction (running a stop sign,
speeding, etc.). So, logically, a young driver who gets 1
point for this is also getting at least 1 other point for
another violation, making a total of 2 points which would
kick in a 30-day restriction. And if another point is
racked up within the year, more serious penalties kick in.
The other way police could discover this violation is, of
course, if the young driver (with young passenger[s]) are
involved in an accident. Then another question is: Would
the parents' insurance company cover losses and damages if
the teen driver were driving illegally? I think that would
be dicey. Does anyone who works in the insurance business
know???
IMHO, whatever the penalties or risks are, so long as s/my
teen is a minor for whom I am legally and financially
responsible, s/he does not have the right to pick and choose
which laws to obey or disobey -- not without risking
PARENTAL consequences of loss of privileges.
Limits with Love
For the parent that wanted to know the consequences of
provisionally licensed teens either driving with minors or
driving after the curfew, you can let your kid know that she
or he is risking losing their license. My son was caught
speeding after midnight with two minors in the car. The
judge took away his license for a month and fined him over
$300 (or many, many hours of community service to work off
the fine). The speeding was the least of it -- it was the
other two charges that he was punished for. The judge could
have taken his license away for a year, but saw that my son
was genuinely remorseful and mature enough to admit the
stupidity of his actions. The community service, btw, isn't
easy to do. The kid can only work with a court-sanctioned
list of agencies and often they don't need help when teens
are available(evenings and weekends). It was such a hassle
for my son (no one called him back after many repeated
calls), he ended up paying the fine. This was before the
changes, when the provisional period was 6 months, not a
year.
Good luck with it all!
marissa
Sept 2005
My son just turns 16. He has been asking me for taking
driving lessons in the past few months. I have told him
repeatedly that he has to wait until he is 18. My reasons
are that 16 is too young to own a car and drive. I have
read a few articles that teenagers brains will not be fully
developed until it's 18. More importantly, my son is a
follower, he is immature and not street smart in certain
things. Not alone the cost of a car, insurance, maintenance
and gas. (I am a single mom and his Dad is out of the
picture). We live 5 minutes from his high school and there
is no reason for him to drive. Parking at the high school
is almost impossible in the morning. I am always available
to take him here and there on weekends. However, all his
best hang-out friends (5-6 of them) are taking lessons
together and start driving. He feels embarrassed and left
out and depressed. He said I don't understand him as much
as other parents understand their child. He said he can
take the lessons together with his friends and not drive
until 18. What shall I do? Let him or stick to my
principal. Please advice. Thank you.
worried single mom
Hi, I'm the Mom of a teen and an injury prevention
professional with knowledge of teen driving issues. The
reason for restricted/graduated licensing is to give the
teen more time behind the wheel before they are fully
licensed, and to reduce certain high-risk situations, like
driving with friends in the car. The research shows that
it's the experience, along with the brain development
issues, that makes us safer drivers. In your case, I think
you should consider doing it your son's way because it is
so important for that whole ''fitting in'' thing -- and it
will give him the driving experience he needs. You could
insist that he not drive to school, that he earn $ for his
own car when the time comes, and set other terms that fit
your family situation. You can learn more about CA's
graduated licensing laws at the DMV website I believe.
Good luck.
Nancy
My advice, for what it's worth, is to go ahead and let him
take the driver's ed training, followed by getting the
permit, followed by at least 6 months of driving with you in
the car with him, followed by (maybe) passing the driving
test and getting his license. You see this whole thing could
easily take the better part of a year. However, once he gets
his license, he doesn't have to own a car or drive to
school. He can just borrow your car occasionally on the
weekends. California has a graduated license, so for the
first six months even with the license he won't be able to
drive a bunch of his buddies around.
In the process of all this, he might well gain some
maturity. If he still wants to own a car, you can have
him research costs like insurance, gas, maintenance, etc.
to convince him that it's just not practical for him now
to own a car.
I think if all his friends are really doing the driver's ed
thing and you won't let him, then he'll build up a lot of
resentment against you that could take years to dissipate.
Good luck.
Dianna
assuming you can afford the cost, I'd urge you to let your
son take the driving lessons, and spend time practicing
with you. my son is almost 17 1/2, and has had his permit
for almost a year. I'd guess that most of his closest
friends are in a similar situation and don't have their
licenses yet either. especially since your son has already
said it's okay with him not to get his license til he's 18,
this really is one battle you don't have to fight, and you
can get some points for letting him take the lessons. you
don't have to pay extra for car insurance until he gets his
license. best wishes getting through this one.
anon for son's privacy
I agree that kids need to have maturity to drive by
themselves, and many kids at 16 are simply not there yet.
That said, there is another important component to driving
safely that you didn't mention: developing driving
skills. Learning to be a good, safe driver takes not only
maturity, it also takes PRACTICE-- the more the better.
My daughter is almost 16 and is very mature for her age.
She is a focused, ambitious student and athelete. She
currently has her driving permit and has logged over 40
hours of driving time with me. While she completely
trustworthy and responsible, she needs alot more practice
before I feel like she'll be safe to drive alone. Fifty
hours over six months (the amount of time legally required
to drive with a parent before taking the test) seems to me
to be the MINIMUM time required for these kids to learn to
drive safely. There is alot to learn-- anticipating
other drivers, judging stopping distances, estimating the
time needed to cross an intersection safely, deciding when
to stop (or not stop) at a yellow light, merging onto
highways and into fast-moving traffic, watching for
pedestrians/ bikes, etc.. In addition, kids often don't
know how to drive to places they've been going to for
years. Learning all this just takes time.
I would advise you to go ahead and let your son get his
permit at 16. Then if you don't let him get his license
until he's 18, at least he'll have well developed driving
skills by the time he does start to drive by himself.
Just as a side note: It is my understanding that one must
take the driving test within one year of getting the
permit. So if you do let him get his permit, but are not
planning to let him get his license within the year, he
will probably have to re-take the written test.
bhovers1
I would highly recommend you let him take the driving
classes now and get his license. Then you can let him drive
sometimes with you in the car. This way by the time he is 18
he will have the experience to drive safely. Also consider
that in case of emergency where you are unable to drive, it
would be great for him to be able to drive.
Deborah
I think you have 2 different topics here. Learning to
drive, and owning a car/driving to school.
I see both as separate issues. If you agree to let your son
take driving lessons, I would certainly do it in a drivers
ed class(as opposed to mom taking him out in a parking
lot). Let him know there are strict boundaries and you may
not let himn drive after all even if he has a license, if
you feel he is not mature enough. I understand the peer
pressure if many of his buddies are learning.
As far as owning a car, or even driving your car...that can
be way down the road. I'd probably lean toward allowing him
to learn with a responsible, reputable instructor, but
really you know him and you are the only one that can
appropriately make that decision.
anon
Feb 2005
I have an about-to-be-16 year old son, who will soon be
getting his driver's license. He is a careful driver, good
grades, and hasn't done anything startlingly bone-headed in
the last year. We've been talking, endlessly, about good
judgement wrt driving, and before he goes for the driver
test, I'd like to put all of this down on paper and have
him, his father and me sign it.
Has anyone written a ''contract'' with their new driver that
lays out your family's rules for driving? I'm thinking
about issues like use of the family car, who is responsible
for the costs associated with driving the car, and
(obviously) consequences for breaking either the family's
rules or California law (especially with respect to underage
passengers!)
Thanks,
a Mom trying to anticipate issues...
Haven't done this (yet, mine is only 13) but it sounds like
a good idea. For thoughts about what to include, you might
want to consult ''Kids and the Law: An A-to-Z Guide for
Parents'' -- a very handy publication from the State Bar of
California (which covers a lot more than driving, etc.)
I think it's available for free by emailing a request to
kids@calbar.ca.gov. Include your name, mailing address,
phone number, and number of copies you want.
AAA has a booklet on teen driving which includes a
contract. At the very least, discuss: who pays for gas,
who pays for insurance, # of riders, curfews, cell phone
use while driving (NO), who pays for repairs to car if in
accident and under what circumstances - also any increase
in insurance premiums, parking tickets, etc. Make it clear
up front what the consequences will be if rules are not
adhered to.
If you make sure that your already responsible teen knows
that an automobile can be a lethal weapon and he is
responsible for far more than just himself and the car, it
will make a big impression. Make sure he understands that
a terrible accident can cause a lifetime's worth of guilt
and possible financial ruin. This is a time when I think
scare tactics make sense as a 16 year old has never had to
think about actions/consequences in such a major way
before.
We had to point out to our 19 year old, away at college,
that the potential consequence of his getting into an
accident in a borrowed underinsured car, could be the loss
of all his college funds if he were to be sued. These are
things young people have not had to think about, no matter
how responsible they are.
anon
I found a teen driver contract at this site:
www.dps.state.mn.us/dvs/DriverLicense/Graduated%20DL/Teen%20Driver%20Contract.pdf
Mary-Ellis
Oct 2004
Need advice, suggestions, recommendations and support
re:whether my 15 yr. old son should get his license,
starting with a permit, and what would be the best way for
him to be taught to drive if and when I feel he is
responsible enough to start the process. As a single mom,
I don't feel this is something I would feel confident
teaching him, and I worry about him speeding, wrecking the
car, etc. He has trouble focusing, remembering his things,
and thinks rules are made to be broken. How have other
parents handled this? Advice, suggestions appreciated. bd
I have a son much like yours. I told him last year that if he wanted to get his
permit and learn to drive, he had to demonstrate over the school year that
he could handle other adult responsibilities in a mature way, like keeping a
cheque register and balancing his chequebook, doing the routine
maintenance required as a computer owner, etc. He didn't make it, and
though I know he wishes he were learning to drive (it would cut his school
commute in half), I think he also knows he's not up to the responsibility.
When the day does come, I found a driving school on the internet that caters
to kids with learning and attention problems and doesn't cost a huge amount
more than the others. (Don't remember its name, sorry.)
July 2004
My almost-15-year-old girl assured me yesterday that
EVERYONE she knows will get a car when she or he is 16.
(Because she knows one 15-year-old who's learning to drive
and who says he'll have a car soon.) I reiterated that she
may take driver safety, or whatever it's called, at
Berkeley High when she's old enough, driving lessons when
she's old enough, etc., but that she may not have a car
until she's at least 18 and able to pay for it herself.
At this point, her assertions appear to simply be a
statement of her need to feel independent, but I did start
wondering what other parents do about driving.
Melanie
I have had a similar conversation with my daughter and I can assure
you that ''everyone'' who turns 16 is not getting a car. I too have
told my daughter that she will have to earn the $ for her first car. I
have a couple of reasons for this, both as a parent and as a safety
professional. I think it is very important to earn things, especially
rites of passage like cars -- it builds self-reliance and more value
is placed on things that people have to work hard for. The safety
aspect is that it is proven that people with experience get in fewer
accidents, and teens just haven't had enough time to gain that
experience. California has a graduated licensing law that attempts to
help teens get this experience step by step, by limiting the times and
conditions under which young people can drive until they become fully
licensed. This has reduced accidents involving 16 year-olds, but
unfortunately they seem to make up for it when they become fully
licensed -- the accident rates increased for 17-20 year olds. Anyway,
for these reasons and more this is one area where I think its really
important to ''put the brakes on''.
strong feelings
My son is 15 1/2 and is currently taking driver's education
and driver's training and will have his permit soon.
Let me assure you that I totally agree with your opinion.
My son will not be getting a car until he is 18. I don't
think we can ever be too safe with this issue. My dad used
to tell me, ''Cars can be fixed, people can't''. Even though
I have a very responsible boy, cars carry way too much risk
for a whole lot of reasons........attention span, friends,
etc etc. I haven't heard any reports from any other 15 1/2
year olds that they will be getting a car at 16. I think it
is important for my son to learn to drive and to have some
experience with driving from 16 to 18. But, this I would
take very slowly.
Linda
Faced with this issue my husband and I felt very strongly that the
last thing we -- or our environment -- needed was yet another car on
the roads. We resisted the pleading of our daughter and are very
pleased with the result. We all share equally in the use of both cars
and when her younger brother starts driving this year he will also
have to share. We are both self employed, however, and our driving
requirements are perhaps more flexible than most. We also made it
clear to both kids that they needed to pay 1/2 of the cost of their
car insurance -- which in this day and age is no small amount of
money. My daughter had to chip in $500 and my son will have to pay
twice that amount for his insurance coverage. I just think it's
really important that our kids learn that driving and owning a car has
financial consequences to the family that they should to contribute
to. Both kids are working this summer to pay for the car insurance --
a win-win solution for us. They're learning the value of work and the
value of money -- and hopefully a basic life lesson as well -- ''
there's no such thing as a free ride . . .''
anon
When our daughter began driving, even before she got her
license, we purchased a third car. We bought it used, and got the
safest car we could (a 12-year-old Mercedes). I drive a stick shift
car, which our daughter was not ready to learn, and her dad drove
a large American car which she was not comfortable navigating or
parking. We wanted her to have a car that she could drive to
school (and take her little sister), and have at her disposal to drive
to after school activities, etc. She has always understood that this
is not HER car, this is our car, and she must ask permission to use
it except for routine trips (school, dr. appts., etc.). She knows that
she will never have a car of her own until she can afford to
purchase it, maintain it, insure it, etc. Until then, however, it has
been in our family's best interest for her to have use of a car. In
fact, most all of her friends have a similar arrangement with their
families. None of us is rich, our kids all go to public schools, and
we live pretty modest lives. Our daughter will be off to college in a
few weeks and there has never been any question that the car will
stay at home, ready for our next child to turn 16. If you go this route
I recommend getting a stodgy car--an old Mercedes, Volvo, or the
like. One that is built like a tank, is very safe, and is nothing a
teenager would be tempted to drive recklessly.
Judy
Very few of my sons' friends at Berkeley High had cars in high school.
The few who did, mostly needed a car to get to work or other activities
before and after school. Anyway, if we are talking about driving to
school in Berkeley, where on earth would they park?! My sons did not
even get their drivers licenses till they were 18, mostly because they
didn't really need to drive before then. On the other hand, teens
who live in suburban areas may be more likely to have a car since
the public transportation options are so limited...
anon
Aug. 2002
I know that this was covered in part in a previous discussion on the
website, but how have other parents dealt successfully with the
restrictions on new teen drivers when all of the other parents of your
teen's friends do not abide by the rules? We had my son wait until he
turned 17 to get his license, since he was older than many of his
classmates and we didn't want him to be the only one of his group driving
as a sophomore. We feel fairly confident in his around-town driving
skills, but are determined to stick by the "no passengers under 20" rule -
for his safety as well as for theirs, and for our insurance liability.
However, as his friends/classmates are turning 16, not one of their
parents seem to insist upon this rule, which puts us at a disadvantage in
enforcing this law. He is currently sharing one of the family cars, and it
seems that most of his friends were handed a car the day they received
their licenses (another point of contention for him), which must
also make it harder for the parents to keep track of what is going on.
Short of calling all of the parents of his friends and asking for
cooperation (which would embarrass him and I'm not sure we'd get anywhere
with this), and short of forbidding him to step in a car with a friend who
just received his/her license (although we are pointing out the reasoning
behind the rule and the dangers involved) and continuing to do what we
have been doing (offering to drive him, his girlfriend, his friends to
places any chance we can), what other suggestions do parents have?
If a teen is caught driving other teens during the six month period, does
he/she get the license taken away until age 18 ... really? It would
help to know that there is this heavy clout, and to use it as an example.
Or do the cops let them off with a mere warning, as all of his friends and
their parents seem to think?
It sure would help if every parent played by the same set of rules (the
*law* in this case!), but I guess that would be wishing for too much...
- (anonymous, please)
I'm replying to the question about teen drivers and the provisional license
rules. We observed this law and did our best to enforce it with our son.
He had access to a car to drive fairly freely while his provisional period
was in effect. We told him firmly that we expected him to abide by the law.
It seems that LOTS of other families don't send that message to their kids.
The actual enforcement of the law was a bit problematic. I don't think the
cops come down super hard about it, and usually give warnings rather than
citations. We gave our son two warnings when it seemed to us that he was not
abiding by our rules. The third time he was driving with another friend in
the car and we found out, we took away all driving privileges for a week.
This meant he had to take the bus to school and to after-school sports
practice, as well as to and from an after-school tutor (to Kensington from
BHS, then home to south Berkeley). We told him if he broke the rules again
he would lose the privilege until the time that it would be legal to drive
with friends in the car, which was three months in the future.
This worked well for our son. I think he was actually under pressure from
other kids to ignore the restriction, since so many other families don't
enforce it. Our drawing the line in such a public way took him off the hook
and enabled him to abide by the rules without losing face socially, and
helped him realize we were serious about the rule.
Please keep me anonymous so my kid won't be embarrassed. Thanks.
Kids who are caught breaking the rules DO get their license taken away from
them. It IS a big deal. These laws were passed for a reason and
statistically teen driving deaths have gone down as a result. Cops have a
no-tolerance rule on this. My husband works for the PD and I hear all the
grisley details, not pleasant but I make sure my son understands the
consequences. He's not driving yet, but when he does, we will have harsher
punishments for him than the law has. I would think the recent stories of
teen deaths in the last year would keep anyone firm about following these
rules. I've read too many news reports on teens just getting their licenses
and ending up dead the same day. Stick to your guns on this one. You can't
control what other people do, but you can set the rules for your own family.
If your son grumbles about him, tell him you'd rather have him alive than
dead.
Sign me anon
New Driving Rules -- my older daughter (now 19) was in the first
batch of teens getting licenses under the new rules (three years ago).
We simply stuck by the rules no matter what anyone did, and we didn't
get her a car until her senior year. The statistics supporting the new
rules are quite strong -- and that was our pitch-- "Experience has shown
that good driving is largely a matter of developing judgment through
experience; until teens have more experience, then we agree that they
don't drive alone with friends during those high-risk times. We want you
to be alive and healthy, so we follow the new rules, no matter what."
These new rules we believe are a matter of life and death for teens.
We made it clear that we had adopted these new rules as a family because
we cared about her and her friends.
Debra
Please make your child stick to the rules, they are good ones. I have
a 16 year old beginning driver and am running into the exact
same situations you are. All my sons friends were given cars
and the parents do not enforce the rules. I decided to take the
hard road because when he had his permit and I was in the car I
was able to see first hand how easily distracted he was (how bad
his driving became) when his friends were in the car with us. I
could only imagine how it would be without me there.
I handled it by having a long talk with him about money. We went over
the facts. I explained to him that insurance companies do not
have to pay if he was driving illegally at the time of an
accident. I showed him the hospital bill from the day he was
born, to let him see how expensive it is. I let him know his
friends would have to sue him to pay such outrageous bills. But
the key fact was to let him know that all these horrible things
could happen even if he was not at fault. The fact is 2 out of
3 California drivers are out there with no insurance. They have
no way to pay-it is up to him to protect himself.
I know a 16 year old girl that got a speeding ticket and an extra
ticket for breaking the provisional rules. She was given a very
high fine. $400. She had her license taken away for 2 weeks and
had to do 50 hours of community service. This just happened a
few months ago. Word out there is the police and judges are
starting to take the rules more seriously than in the past.
Good luck.
AJF
Sept. 2002
This subject is one more piece of evidence that it does,
indeed, take a village to raise a child. We need to
support one another. My son is 15, and can't wait to
get his license. My new husband (his stepfather) and I
plan to sit down with my son when he gets his license,
and clearly lay out our expectations. Violating the new
driver restrictions will result in us taking away his
license for a period of time (to be determined). My
husband has also stated that if he's caught street
racing, we'll take away any car and sell it. My husband
loves cars, and is glad to share his knowledge with my
son. On a more serious note, my husband's mother, while
riding a bike, was killed by a drunk driver; my husband
was only 17 at the time. He has a deep understanding of
the hazards and consequences associated with
irresponsible driving. I encourage you to make sure
your son follows the rules, and I'll do the same with
mine.
sympathetic parent
Friday night my daughter was injured in a car accident. She was riding
with a 16 year old driver who offered her a ride, but had only had her
license for 3 months. On top of that, the driver took two other passengers
and was driving home after curfew.
She ran a red light in an intersection and was broadsided. My daughter
had the worst of the injuries: facial lacerations and a shard of glass was
imbedded above her eye, requiring 7 stitches to close it. Her wrist may be
fractured - we won't know that for a few more days. She has body aches and
pains but is lucky to be walking around. Had she been sitting by the
passenger door, instead of in the middle of the back seat, her injuries would
have been a lot more serious.
I write because last week a mother pleaded for parents to be aware of the
new driving restrictions and enforce them. Even though the driver's parents
had forbidden their daughter to drive others, she did. In addition to having
other kids in the car and driving after curfew, she tested positive for
alcohol at the scene. Her license has been suspended for a year.
As a parent, I have learned a painful lesson. I cannot take my daughter's
word about her transportation arrangements with friends, because she doesn't
know who can legally drive her. I need to call the parents and find out if
the drivers are in fact legally able to drive passengers. And I need to
communicate these plans to other parents. I sense a reluctance by parents to
get in their kids' faces about plans, parties, transportation, etc. I feel
fortunate that the accident wasn't worse. And it seems that the kids involved
feel real remorse and have experienced a wake up call.
But it is our job as parents to keep our kids safe. And checking up on
plans, drivers, legal limits and asking about drinking, drugs and driving is
one way we all need to get involved. I urge every parent to stop a make a
phone call before they let their child ride with another teen. Perhaps that
call can avert the heartache we're now experiencing.
Please keep this anonymous.
Thank you.
Oct 2001
My 16 year old recently got her driver's license. Recent changes to the law
require new teenage drivers to 1) not drive other teenagers for 6 months
after they receive their license and 2) not drive at all between midnight and
5 A.M. Of course my daughter says, "None of the other parents care about
this," or "X's dad says he assumes he'll drive friends anyway and would
rather know about it than have him lie," and of course I say, "You're stuck
with the parents you've got," and "If a cop stops you, you could lose your
license." Although in general, she's a serious, responsible person, I'm
concerned that she's disobeying these laws and not being truthful. Most of
all, I'm concerned about her concentrating on the road and becoming a safe,
experienced driver. I don't want to be either suspicious or naive. I would
love to hear how others have handled these issues.
Welllll, yes and no. Depends. We have discussed the rules with her,
and the reasons for the rules. She has already had to deal with an
accident (the other guy's fault, fortunately--but would it have
happened to a more experienced driver? Unclear.), so I think she is
more careful now than before (she had another teen in the car at the
time (daytime), and stood to lose her 3-month-old license if a cop had
actually shown up). We are pretty divided on the subject. What we
have said is that we'd rather have HER behind the wheel with her
friends, stone-cold sober, than risk having one of her older friends
drive who is NOT sober (for whatever reason). Since she is very
intent on driving, she'd rather stay sober than miss out on driving.
Which of course gives us the somewhat middling comfort of knowing that
at least she's not smashed on whatever the other kids are smashed on.
Needless to say, we've also made it clear that if she ever feels she
isn't safe to drive, she is to call us, at any time of day or night,
and we'll come get her as soon as we can (the offer does not
necessarily extend to her friends, however). She did this once. It's
a real game of give and take, and a test of how much you trust your
teen, in some cases. Forbidding our teen to do anything pretty much
never works, so we need to work with her as much as possible, and
sometimes that means compromising a bit.
This is in reply to the parent who was wondering how other parents
handled the driving restrictions for the first and second six months
for new teen drivers. I suspect many parents turn a blind eye to the
restrictions, but we don't. We have told our son we expect him to
abide by those rules and that if he doesn't and we find out that his
privileges will be taken away. He REALLY doesn't want that to happen.
We did this for two reasons: one, because if he is stopped by police
and is caught violating this rule he may lose his driver's license as
a result; and two, we don't want to find ourselves condoning
disobeying laws, as we feel it would give the wrong message. We
discussed this issue with him more with a flavor of "don't do
something stupid and get in trouble with the police" than it being our
own idea. So far he has (I'm pretty sure) honored the rule, and I
hope this continues.
I don't have a 16 year-old yet, but urge you to hold fast on
insisting your child follow laws that are designed to protect her
(and all of us) from inexperienced and/or distracted drivers. I will
say that my new policy on "the other parents don't care", w/ a 13
year-old is to ask for phone numbers and speak directly with the
other parents, anytime that logic surfaces. It often turns out that
the other parents got the same line from their teen.
From my own experience at 16 (Pennsylvania) a pumpkin license (gone
at midnight) was an excellent excuse to either go home or stay over
at someone's house from 12-5am. It wasn't a hardship, but my parents
letting me violate the law because I wanted to would have been.
Heather
Regarding the parent asking about driving rules, we also enforced these
rules with our daughter, even though none of the other parents of her
friends seemed to care. This meant that our daughter would drive alone to
evening/weekend events, and all of her other newly driving friends would
break the law and come together in a separate car. This was difficult for
our daughter to tolerate at the time, but she is now 17.5, a safe driver,
and we are glad that we stuck to the law.
Janet
My 16 year old son got his license at the end of March. I was adamant that
he obey the driving-with-others restrictions. I saw him once riding with a
friend who wasn't legally allowed to drive him. And I gave him a warning
about not being able to drive for a certain period of time if he broke the
law again. (Perhaps a similar warning should be given right away when the
kid gets their license.) Well, we caught him driving someone two weeks
before he could legally do so and his driving privileges were taken away for
two weeks. It turns out that he (by his own admission) had given rides to
friends four times during the six month restriction period - "They needed a
ride. What was I supposed to do, leave them there?" In theory I strongly
believe in upholding the law. "Because everyone else is doing it" is no
reason at all to let them break the law. On the other hand, we found it
almost impossible to monitor. We were lucky to have caught him. Maybe ours
has been a rather slapdash approach to the problem and others have a more
systematic approach.
Our 16 year old girl was highly motivated to drive. She got her
license the morning that she turned 16. We made her stick to the rules
religiously with much protesting in the beginning but she got used to
it. When she had her permit, my husband let her drive to a field trip
with several kids in the car. A car full of 16 year old girls can be
very noisy and distracting and he pointed that out to her. With
laughing kids and loud music, he told she would not be able to
concentrate on her driving. When I was 16 I also got into an accident
while talking to a friend, not paying attention. So were very strict
and told her if she was caught driving kids around she would lose her
car privleges. Since she was older than the rest (a December baby) she
was the first of all her friends to get her license. I also didn't
want her to become the driver of all her friends. Needless to say they
all called her on the first day and told her the same arguments all
kids give,! y! our parents won't know etc. I feel confident that
since she told us this story that she followed the rules. She did say
that it became annoying always being asked to drive everyone and that
our rules gave her an out. After about 4 months we did let her drive
one friend to avoid the complications when someone was spending the
night of having her drive home and her friend having to ask someone
else for a ride. At 16 and 1/2 she started driving her friends. She
still comes home at 12 when she takes the car which also makes the
night out not so late. When she wants to stay out past 12 she doesn't
take the car.
In addition to this we gave her a Highway Survival
Course for her 16th birthday
(See recommendations for Sear's Point Highway Survival Course for the rest of this review.)
I thought this article from the San Jose Mersury might be of use to other parents:
http://www0.mercurycenter.com/premium/local/docs/roadtip11.htm "More notes on restrictions for new teenage drivers"
Car and 16-y-o out for the night
Nov 2001
Since my 16 yo son is my only child I don't have experience in a lot
of areas except by gaining it through trial and error. My latest
confusion has to do with use of the car. He has had his license since
last March and so far (knock on wood) so good. I don't have any
problem with daytime use, it's the nighttime use that I waiver on. He
wants to be able to take the car (we have 2) and spend the night at a
friend's house. The problem with this is that I feel he's out there
wandering around loose in the world and I'm not having any control
over him. I initially said no, that if he wanted to spend the night
at a friend's house, I would take him and pick him up. If he wanted
to take the car out, he would have to be back at 11:45 (his current
curfew). Then I gave in and let him keep the car over night and felt
horrible about it. I guess while writing this I see that I should
stick to my guns ... but he knows so well how to manipulate me to get
my way. I guess the other issue is how not to wimp out with my
teenager when I (have to admit it) really want to be loved by him like
I was when he was younger. I'd appreciate any feedback on this issue
from parents who have been there. Thanks.
It was my understanding that new drivers can not stay out all night, in fact
can not drive after a certain time without an adult in the car. My son is 16
and does not have his license yet, but you can be sure he is going to follow
all the new rules when he does get it or he can wait until he's 18 as far as
I'm concerned. Having a close friend who lost their son because of driving
stupid so soon after getting his license, I'm not budging on this particular
issue.
I suggest you read through the new restrictions again and use them to your
advantage. If you feel uncomfortable, those new rules should help.
Marianne
New Drivers
My son just got his drivers license (yikes!) and I have a question:
We were told that for the first 6 months that he has his licence that he
cannot have other minors in the car when he is driving. My son claims that
this is not practical, not enforceable and nobody follows this rule. Does
anyone know more?
Robin
New drivers under 18 are now prohibited from carrying other teenagers in their
car unless there accompanied by a licensed driver over 25. New drivers are
under incredible pressure to give their non-driving friends rides, which
doesn't help. For instance, our son has occasionally violated this law, which
has been a matter of some discussion . Apparently the police don't stop
them just for looking underage, but if they're stopped for any other reason
(or the officer recognizes the driver) it's something else they have to deal
with. It is being enforced, teenagers cited for violating it will lose their
license. The word is that the suspensions have been running around 6 months,
though they could loose it until they're 18.
They also can't drive at all between midnight and 5 am, even alone.
Chris
There are several limitations on new drivers. First, for the first 6 months
they cannot drive with anyone under the age of 20 unless they are accompanied
by a driver 25 years or older. THe second six months allows peer passengers
without the 25 year old in the car. The obvious reason for this rule is that
16 year olds have more accidents than members of other age groups. These
accidents are often due to inexperience and distraction. The DMV hopes to
limit the distraction until the driver has more hours of experience. Yes
it's impractical. Sometimes my son drives while his friend bikes along. In
the first week he did have others in the car until I got wind of it from
another parent and I reminded him what it would be like to not have a license
for 2 years and asked whether it was worth risking his license to drive some
girl to the video store. He and his friends do stick to it. It's up to him,
since I'm not there to check.
The next restriction is the one I love the most. Your new driver cannot
drive between the hours of midnight and 5 am. unless there's a 25 year old in
the car. This last a full year. In other words, there's a built in
curfew-- much like Cinderella's coach turning into a pumpkin. I would have
given my eye tooth to have had this restriction on my older son's license.
Now, by 12:05 a.m. I hear that key in the door.
If your child decides not to abide by the 1st year limitations on the license
he might get away with it, but then again he might be stopped for that burned
out tail light and I believe he can lose the license. The DMV has a booklet
explaining all this. It's a parent's handbook and available at the DMV
office.
The bottom line is: it's the law. The law is the law, even when nobody else
follows it.
-Winifred
From the DMV's web page http://www.dmv.ca.gov/faq/dlfaq.htm:
Provisional driver license restrictions during the first year
The following new restrictions are for minors who apply after July 1,
1998, pass their driving test at DMV and are issued a provisional driver
license.
During the first 6 months you are licensed to drive you must be
accompanied by a driver 25 years of age or older if you drive
between the hours of 12 a.m. and 5 a.m. or if you have passengers
under the age of 20 in the car at any time.
During the second 6 months, you must still be accompanied by a
driver 25 years of age or older if you drive between the hours of 12
a.m. and 5 a.m., however, now you may have passengers under the
age of 20 in the car without supervision between the hours of 5 a.m.
and midnight.
Yes the California Vehicle Code (CVC) now prohibits teens under 18 from
driving other teens for the first six months after they get their
license. They are also prohibited from driving between midnight and 5
am.
First let me say that this kind of program is happening in many states,
and that it is reducing
the number of teen driving fatalities. I strongly supported the law with
my daughter during her first six months. I wish the period was longer,
because when she started driving her friends, she got in an accident.
I found the CVC on-line and read all the loop-holes that exist. For
purposes of driving to and from school if there's no other way, they can
drive their own siblings, but must carry a signed letter from the head
of the school.
Penalties include loss of licence until 18 years old!
This law needs strong support from parents to lower teen deaths from
driving.
Roger
I don't know about everybody else, but my daughter and her friends
are taking the "no passengers under 20" at face value and not
transporting under-20-year-olds without an adult over 25 on board.
By the way, if there's an adult over 25 in the car, it's OK. Here's
what's on the California DMV website:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/faq/dlfaq.htm#FIRSTYEAR
The following new restrictions are for minors who apply after
July 1, 1998, pass their driving test at DMV and are issued a
provisional driver license.
During the first 6 months you are licensed to drive you must
be accompanied by a driver 25 years of age or older if you drive
between the hours of 12 a.m. and 5 a.m. or if you have passengers
under the age of 20 in the car at any time.
During the second 6 months, you must still be accompanied by
a driver 25 years of age or older if you drive between the hours of
12 a.m. and 5 a.m., however, now you may have passengers under the
age of 20 in the car without supervision between the hours of 5 a.m.
and midnight.
Son Driving Soon!
July 1999
for Peter re: son driving soon! 1) get the teen booklet from the DMV
and 2) call the Berkeley Driving School (located in El Cerrito and
Oakland). These 2 places will get you through it all! Oh, and talk to
your insurance agent if you plan to purchase another vehicle. Some
models are much cheaper to insure than others for teen drivers. Also,
the student should maintain a "B" average for cheaper rates. You'll
need a photocopy of the report card. Good luck.
My 16 year old took Driver's Education in BHS summer school. That
course gives her the privilege of taking the written test for a
learner's permit (the same written test you need to take for a
license). After she passes the written test I plan on signing her up
for Driver Training with Bay Area Driving School in Oakland (430-8770)
(they will pick up and deliver the driver at home). The Driver Ed is
cheap, the Driver Training is expensive. You can do the Driver Training
yourself as a parent. [I would rather start teaching her after she has
had 6 hours of training in a dual control car with a professional!] The
DMV pamphlet will tell you all the complicated rules for young
drivers. Cynthia
For the question about teen driving, one's first stop should be the DMV
where you can pick up the following: 1) Changes to licensing
requirements for teenagers (which went into effect 7/98), 2) How to
teach your child to drive booklet, and 3) Application for Instructional
Permit. The first 2 are helpful pamphlets which answer many of your
questions. The third is important to see what's involved.
Basically, the requirements are:
- Your child can start driver education and receive his permit
at age 15. This is one of the new rules effective last year.
-
30 hours of driver education is required before getting a
permit. This can be taken in a licensed school (see Yellow Pages) or one
school offers the option to do it via correspondence. If you sign up for
driver education class at a school, that does not mean you have to take
driver education at the same school (although of course, the schools
prefer it) Call around for best times and convenience. During the
summer these classes are taught during the week (for example, Monday
through Thursday, about 8 am to 4 pm); during the school year they are
usually taught on both Saturday and Sunday of 2 consecutive weekends.
Have your son ask his friends where they took driver education.
- Following this, your child can apply for his permit. Taking
the written test soon after he finishes the class is useful since he'll
remember more of the details.
-
After he gets his permit, he then must start his
behind-the-wheel driver training with a licensed teacher. Have him ask
his friends for recommendations. After completing the first hour of
behind-the-wheel training with a licensed driving instructor, he is then
able to go out with his parents. All together, before he goes for his
driving test, he is required to have 6 hours of behind-the-wheel
training.
-
A child is not able to take his driving test until he's 16,
but he also must have had his instructional permit for 6 months before
he can take the test. And he must have completed his 6 hours with the
driving instructor. Also the parent has to sign that, in addition, the
child has had 50 hours of adult-supervised driving which includes 10
hours of night driving.
-
Regarding insurance, it is best to check with your own
insurance company. However, mine told me that I did not need to add him
to my policy while he just had his permit. The parent does have to sign
the Application for a License/Permit on which you indicate your
financial responsibility for your child. That's why it's handy to get
this form ahead of time to see what's involved.
-
It's useful to ask your insurance company ahead of time what
the cost would be to add your child to your policy once he gets his
license, so you know ahead of time what costs to anticipate.
Frances
Home |
Reviews |
Advice |
Members |
Post a Message
Join BPN |
Help |
What's New |
Search |
Contact Us
Last updated: Jan 27, 2007
Copyright © 1996-2008 Berkeley Parents Network
The opinions and statements expressed on this website
are those of parents who subscribe to the
Berkeley Parents Network. Please see
Disclaimer & Usage for
information about using content on this website.