CVS Test
Berkeley Parents Network >
Advice >
Pregnancy & Childbirth >
Prenatal Testing > CVS Test
October 2007
After reading all the glowing reviews for Dr. Mary Norton for CVS
prenatal diagnostic testing, I contacted UCSF to schedule an
appointment with her. Unfortunately, in the middle of 2007 Dr.
Norton moved to Kaiser Permanente in SF, and can *only* attend to
Kaiser member patients. The number there is 415-833-2200.
http://www.permanente.net/homepage/doctor/marynorton/
September 2007
I'm trying to get a sense of how much my share of the cost of a
CVS procedure will cost and thought I'd tap the collective wisdom
of this group. If anyone is covered by Blue Cross PPO and has
recently used a preferred provider for CVS, could you tell me
what the Amount Billed and Member Savings was on your Explanation
of Benefits Statement?
I know the insurance will pay 80% of the maximum allowable cost
because I'm going to a preferred provider. The problem is that
they won't tell me what that maximum allowable cost is without
jumping through hoops (filling out a paper form and waiting two
weeks for a response when my CVS is scheduled for the end of next
week). Argh.
Anon
My son will be 3 in December, and I had a CVS when I was about
10 weeks pregnant. I had (still have) Blue Cross, but I didn't
go to a preferred provider, if I recall correctly. So my share
was rather high, about $900. I had my CVS done at California
Pacific, and I recommend them highly. If I had done the CVS in
the East Bay, then maybe I would have had to pay less, but my
doctor really recommended having a CVS in San Francisco, saying
that the doctors at both California Pacific and UCSF had more
experience, and a lower miscarriage rate, than the doctor in
the East Bay.
Lori
April 2007
Hi,
I am trying to get feedback for Dr. Jonathan Weiss (East Bay Perinatal)
for CVS. I have one baby girl and did not go through any invasive testing
when I was pregnant with her. But I just turned 35 and am 8 wks pregnant.
After a lot of reading, thinking... we have decided for CVS but we are
nervous as the only doc my insurance will cover is Dr. Weiss.
Any info on first hand
experiences will be really appreciated. The Genetic Counsellor at East
Bay Perinatal told me he does between 100-150 cases per year and has a
failure rate of 1:200 (which is very different from what I read on the
reviews).
Unfortunately my insurance will not cover Dr. Goldberg or Dr. Norton. So
I am debating whether to pay out of pocket and go to them or to go with
Dr. Weiss and have insurance cover all expenses. Thanks for any info that
can be shared. - Nervous mom!
Nervous mom
When I was looking for a Perinatologist for CVS last August, I
also considered Dr.Weiss, but decided to go out of network (and
pay out of pocket) to see Dr.Goldberg. My decision was based on
Dr.Goldberg's glowing reputation and also because I couldn't find
much info on anyone else. Turns out I had to wait to do an amnio
instead because my retrograde uterus made CVS impossible, so I
can't comment on Dr.Goldberg either. However, for the rest of my
pregnancy, I saw and was monitored by Dr.Weiss. He was warm and
caring and easy to talk with. He performed an amnio on me and he did a fine job. I
would feel comfortable going back to him
for CVS. I'll also mention though that the SF practice with Dr.Goldberg is ultra fancy
and I felt like it was unnecessarily
posh. The East Bay Perinatal office isn't as nice but has
perfectly good new equipment. Next time, I don't think I would
agree to pay $600+ to go out of network, now that I've met
Dr.Weiss and feel comfortable about his competency. I hope this
is somewhat helpful to you in your important decision. Good
luck. Anon
I had similar apprehensions about Dr. Weiss for the reasons that
you mention. In addition, I had a successful CVS performed by
Dr. Goldberg several years ago for my first child. After much
thought and consultation with my OB, I decided to go to Dr.
Weiss. I had a positive experience with him (perhaps even
better than with Dr. Goldberg). If we decide to have a third
child, I will feel confident about returning to Dr. Weiss. I
wish you the best!
Pleased with Dr. Weiss
January 2007
Hi all,
I have my first CVS appointment on Tuesday, March 20th with Dr.
Robin Fields of Kaiser in SF. I haven't found much online about
Dr. Fields, so would love to know what your experience has been
if you have had him for CVS. Any insight would be appreciated!
Best, Juliet
I had a CVS with Dr. Fields in late 2004. Nothing about the
procedure stood out and I remember him being pretty outgoing and
explaining what was going on. (I went by myself without my
husband). He does a lot of these (according to my Kaiser OB, a
the time he was the ''one'' that does CVS in the Bay Area) and it
shows. The worst part frankly was waiting for the procedure in
the waiting room with a full bladder as they were way behind on
the appointments (when I finally got in the room they let me
empty a bit). My advice would be to schedule it in the morning,
if possible.
Healthy Child after CVS
I had a CVS performed by Robin Fields of Kaiser-SF in late
December. This is my second pregnancy, and for the 1st I didn't
have any invasive testing, so I was incredibly nervous and did a
lot of research. I felt much better knowing that Fields has been
doing CVS procedures for 15 years, and does them only once a
week, but he had several others that same day. Plus he is known
(according to my genetic counselor at Kaiser) to be more
conservative (in terms of not going in for a second attempt if
they didn't get enough sample) than the San Jose Kaiser doc. I
found his manner calm and reassuring, and I am very happy that I
had the procedure done rather than waiting for an amnio. It was
hard deciding since it seemed like everything I read favored
amnios, but finding out early, for me had several advantages. I
found it stressful driving into the city by myself, and having to
have a full bladder, but I was very pleased with Fields and the
Kaiser SF staff there. Good luck!
anon
January 2007
Has anyone had a CVS performed recently by Dr. Weiss of East Bay
Perinatal? When I asked his office about his numbers, I was told
that he performs more than 50 CVS procedures annually and was
quoted a miscarriage rate of less than 1%, which is below the
national average. However, I know other Bay Area doctors are
more experienced with this procedure, performing 100s of CVS
procedures annually (e.g., Jim Goldberg, Mary Norton, Carl Otto).
I'm considering paying out-of-pocket for the procedure. I've
read the archives but they are dated for Dr. Weiss. It would be
great to hear about other people's more recent experiences with
Dr. Weiss!
Thanks! Anonymous
Dr. Weiss barely spoke to me or explained what he was doing during my
procedure. He even wore the earpiece to his
phone during the entire procedure. He numbed my cervix without asking me and just mentioned
it in passing when the procedure was over. I did bleed for a few days afterward, though
everything turned out fine.
On the upside, I got my results back quickly -- not sure if everyone does that or if they are
particularly fast.
Anon
November 2006
I'm trying to figure out whether to get CVS with Mary Norton --
who's been highly recommended on BPN - or Denise Main or Carl
Otto at CPMC. My OB recommended me to James Goldberg's practice
but when I found out they don't take my insurance, she said to go
to CPMC instead. I would have to get a referral from my OB before
I could see Norton and want to have a good reason to ask!
Anyone had CVS with Main or Otto or know about their experience?
Did they used to be in a practice with Goldberg?
Thanks!
CVS Nervous
Over four years ago, I had a CVS by Dr. Main. I was the unlucky one in 100 who had a
miscarriage because of it. I remember the nurse at the time of the procedure saying
''Wow, you got a big piece (of the placenta)!'' Frightening. I understand that these
things happen, but I would recommend going to Dr. Norton. I became pregnant with twins
last year, and I went to her to get a CVS, even though I was terrified. At UCSF, they
recommended having an NT procedure first. Based on my good results from that test,
they recommended foregoing the CVS procedure.
Good Luck
anon
I have had a CVS done by Mary Norton, and twice by Carl Otto.
Carl Otto is in practice with Jim Goldberg at CPMC. I do not know
about Dr. Mane. I actually liked Dr. Otto better. He does not
have much of a bedside manner, but he is great. Their genentic
counselors, however, have much to be desired.......But, it is the
person doing the CVS that really matters. annon
I am currently seeing Dr. Carl Otto for my twin pregnancy and I
would HIGHLY recommend him. He helped pioneer CVS in the US. My
regular OB recommended I see only him or Dr. Goldberg. Dr. Main
is very good as well but I believe Dr. Otto is the one to see for
CVS.
Yes, Dr. Goldberg previously practiced with Drs.
Main and Goldberg. I did not have a CVS with Dr. Otto but another
procedure and he has been excellent
Anon
I had two CVS procedures with Dr. Otto at CPMC. My OB highly recommended him, and I do
too! I got happy news with both tests, I have two darling boys now, and the procedure
gave me such peace of mind. I got one transvaginally (the easy way) and the other
through my abdomen (not as much fun), and I'd be happy to give you more details if you
e-mail me. Dr. Otto radiates confidence and is very efficient. It is obvious he REALLY
knows what he's doing. CVS is so worth it!
Jennifer
Hi,
I went to Mary Norton last year for my CVS. She was wonderful -
extremely competent, and she also had a wonderful bedside manner.
I was nervous before the procedure, and she was very soothing and
kind. Actually, I have to say that out of all the drs I saw
during my pregnancy, including my regular OB, she was by far my
favorite. I really cannot recommend her highly enough. She is
definitely worth asking for a referral!
anon
October 2006
Has anyone had CVS with Dr. Weiss at East Bay Perinatal? This
is the only place my insurance will cover, and I know he does
fewer procedures than docs at UCSF or CPMC, wondering about
complication rates...I called the office and they gave me an
overall rate of all complications of 1:100
I went to East Bay Perinatal for my CVS, which was performed by Dr. Weiss, in
September '04. Like you, it was the only one my insurance covered. The procedure
went fine, no complications at all. The genetic counselor was very helpful and
informative. Dr. Weiss was not exactly Mr. Bedside Manner -- after I was draped
and the initial scan was done by tech, he was in and out of the room and completely
done with the procedure in less than five minutes. But, hey, who wants to prolong
the time her legs are in stirrups? I didn't even have any spotting after the
procedure, and it was very reassuring to me to have the definitive genetic results
that early in the pregnancy. Yes, there's definitely a bias in favor of the folks
in San Francisco, but they are experienced professionals at East Bay Perinatal too.
It's not a choice between a Rolls Royce and a Yugo; it's a choice between a Rolls
Royce and a Mercedes. If you're going to look at ''complication rates'' -- and
that's not at all a bad idea -- do make sure that you know how different doctors
measure and report those, because it may not be apples to apples. Happy with my
CVS
I decided to have a CVS with my first pregnancy at East Bay Perinatal in July 2003.
Dr. Weiss was the doctor assigned to do the procedure. I did not do much research
in advance about CVS. I was over 40 and naively thought that knowing early if there
were any problems or complications would be better. I lost my baby immediately
after the procedure while still in the office. Dr. Weiss and the nurse didn't
handle the situation very well. When the baby's heart beat slowed as they continued
to monitor me, they said I should come back after lunch and they would check it
again. The nurse shuffled me out the office quickly without much compassion. My
husband had already left thinking everything was fine with me and the baby. I was
left on my own to wait in the parking lot until the office reopened after lunch. I
was not offered a phone or a place to sit. After lunch there was no improvement
with the heart beat. Dr. Weiss kept saying, ''this has never happened to ME
before.'' I was then told to come back the next day and they would check it again.
The baby's heart had stopped by the next morning. I later learned that Dr. Weiss
only performed about 6 or 8 CVSs per year. And that he is not well regarded in the
OB-GYN community.
Here's my advice: Do your research. Consider the triple-screen blood test and then
an Amnio as a next step. If you really want a CVS, pay the money and go where they
have more experience at California Pacific Medical Center and ask for Dr. Goldberg.
They handle hundreds per year and Dr. Goldberg is considered one of the best in the
area. Check again with your insurance company. They may allow you to go there if
you don't have confidence in East Bay Perinatal. Also schedule your visit with the
genetics counselor well before your CVS appointment so you don't have to make a
decision that day about what you will do. It is very traumatic to lose a baby at
any stage. Make sure you understand the risks and proceed with caution
anon
I saw Dr. Weiss for a CVS in early 2005. I had tried to get an appointment at UCSF
but couldn't get one within the 'window' you have for the procedurel. For the most
part I was happy with my experience, however if I had to do it again, I'd schedule
earlier with UCSF. The few complaints I had were: 1) the genetic 'counselor' we
had to meet with didn't have answers to our questions (one of which was the
complication rate). I thought the appointment with her was a waste of time.
2) the gal who made the appointment told me I had to drink a ton of water
beforehand, so I did, then had to wait over an hour only to be told I didn't need
to drink the water - I was ready to burst!
Hi, Dr. Weiss performed a CVS for me in the Spring of 2005. I
was really terrified, because I had the CVS for my first
pregnancy at CPMC where they do many more of them. However, I
have to say that my experience with Dr. Weiss was really
positive. He was really reassuring, and I had absolutely no
problems after the procedure. Obviously, this isn't a risk-free
procedure, but I was happy with Dr. Weiss and his practice. If
you have anymore questions, feel free to email me. Ann
I had an amnio done at the EastBay Perinatal Center on Telegraph.
The staff is VERY nice and they did everything they could to make
me comfortable and inform me every step of the way.
I can't remember who my doctor there was, but I saw a few (I had
to go in twice) But the doctors, nurses & general staff were GREAT!
Kelly
August 2006
hi. i'm 40 and pregnant. my ob is recommending Dr. Mary Norton
at USF for a CVS. i'd be grateful to hear about any experiences
anyone has with her. i've had an amnio before but am very
nervous about having CVS. also, what are the most current
statistics on miscarriage rates from CVS? thanks so much
anon
Mary Norton (at UCSF, not USF) is the BEST, and I work in the
field. She is the most experienced and knowledgeable clinician
for this procedure in the Bay Area. I had a CVS with her about 6
months ago and all my friends/colleagues who are OBs go to her.
Her miscarriage rate is less than 1 in 400
NP
I had a CVS with Mary Norton in June 2004. She was a clear
first choice from my OB GYN and I followed that advice. Mary
was absolutely excellent and extremely professional. The
office was great - highly organized, good bedside manner,
professinal and knowledgeable. I would go back to her (and only
her) in a heartbeat.
Check her rates, but my understanding was that UCSF's rates of
miscarriage post CVS are exactly equal to the miscarriage rate
vs. amnio (you generally see a higher rate). That is probably
due to Mary's vast experience
tania
I've had cvs twice with Dr. Goldberg at cpmc. No complications
other than bad news. Good friend has had cvs twice with Dr.
Norton & also had no complications. Having had both cvs &
amnio, I prefer cvs. (I was crampy for a week after amnio but
sore for a few days after trans-abdominal cvs. Trans-cervical is
like a pap smear but with a full bladder. Full bladder part is
the worst of it.) Getting bad news at 12 or 13 weeks is very
different than getting it at 17 or 18 weeks (been there).
Miscarriage rates are debated for CVS as a percentage of
pregnancies at 10/11 weeks would miscarry on their own. For
faster results you can request FISH analysis - takes about 2
days.
good luck
Dr. Norton is probably the best physician in the Bay area to do
your CVS. She is the director of UCSF's Prenatal Diagnostic
Center and I believe she is board certified in both
obstetrics/gynecology as well as radiology. The miscarriage rate
associated with CVS is generally quoted as around 2%, but is far
less than 1% at UCSF. I would also highly recommend Sarah, her
genetic counselor, if you're given the option.
I'm a physician myself and kept my UCSF health coverage
specifically so that I could have Dr. Norton perform CVS for me
during 2 different pregnancies.
Best of luck.
jeanne
Hi,
I had a CVS this year with Dr Chueh at Stanford (Lucille Packard
Children's Hospital). We were quoted a loss rate of between
1/250 and 1/300 which was approximately the same as Stanford's
loss rate for amnio. Given that the loss rate was so low, we
thought we would be fine and decided to go with CVS because it
would be nice to have the results sooner rather than later.
Dr. Chueh's manner was brisk and somewhat impersonal, but she
did seem professional and highly competent. Unfortunately, I
started bleeding pretty heavily a few minutes after the CVS
procedure and it continued and worsened until I miscarried later
that same day.
I don't want to scare anyone, but I was just so shocked and
hugely disappointed that I lost my whole pregnancy due to the
CVS procedure. The odds were so low and I never thought that I
would be the 1 person in 250-300 to miscarry. I have done a lot
of soul-searching since this experience, and still do feel that
proceeding with a CVS (or amnio) is a reasonable choice under
certain circumstances. I just wish that I had been told me that
somebody *IS* going to be the one in 300, and if that someone
ends up being you, then for you personally the loss rate is 100%.
One final note about Dr. Chueh at Stanford: she left me a phone
message the day after my miscarriage in what seemed to be an
attempt to comfort me. The content of her message, though, was
very upsetting because what she tried to evade responsibility
and find a reason to blame me for the loss. Perhaps she was
sincerely well-intentioned and is just lacking in people
skills? In any event, I wished that she hadn't called me at
all.
Given that Dr. Norton has received multiple positive reviews on
this site, and also because her loss rate is even lower than Dr
Chueh's, I would recommend against seeing Dr. Chueh.
Good luck to you
Anon
I had my CVS done with dr. norton last year after a
miscarrarriage. I was forty-one and scared that something would
go wrong. In addition I was plagued with morning sickness
during that time. Dr. Norton heard my concerns with the
procedure and was very reassuring. So was the staff - even
after I threw up on the exam table right before the procedure.
Dr. Norton was quick - the acutal procedure took about a minute
or two tops. The drinking the water and waiting took longer. I
did have some discomfort afterwards and stayed off my feet for a
day or two. When I got the call that everything was ok I was
very relieved. I have a beautiful nine month old today.
Good Luck
judy
December 2005
I'm scheduled to get a CVS from Dr. Mary Norton at UCSF though
I'm wondering if I should switch to Dr. Jim Goldberg at CPMC.
I've read the archives and they both have good reviews, though
Dr. Goldberg has far more of them. Any thoughts? Anyone know
Dr. Norton's miscarriage rates?
Anon
I only know Goldberg by reputation (which is stellar, as you know), but I did have an amnio with Dr. Norton. I really liked her, thought she was very personable and skilled. Her true specialty, though, is CVS. She does many, many of them, and she is the head of the Genetic Testing dept. at UCSF, so she is one of the best. Her office should be able to tell you her miscarriage rate (as you probably know it is the provider-
specific rate that you want vs. the rate generally associated with the procedure). Good luck.
I am an ob/gyn NP and have many friends who are obstetricians,
and we all went to Mary Norton for our CVS's/amnios and wouldn't
consider going to anyone else. I had a CVS 6 weeks ago w/her,
and her miscarriage rate is less than a quarter of one percent. I would definitely keep your appointment with her. She is wonderful.
Debbie
I had a CVS with Dr. Norton in February 2005. I recommend her highly. You could always call her office and ask her complication rate, which I did when choosing her: she's the head of the UCSF Prenatal Diagnosis Center and does 25 CVS procedures per *week* with a complication rate of 1/200 (better than the national average). Plus she and her staff were kind and competent.
Lucky to have a healthy son
August 2005
Has anyone had a CVS done recently at UCSF? I'm having mine
done in a few weeks and I'm really nervous. I'll be about 12
1/2 weeks when I have the test. I'm going to be 40 when I
deliver this baby, so I want to do prenatal testing, but I've
heard good and scary things about the procedure. I would love
to hear about people's experiences at UCSF! Thanks!
Anonymous
We had a CVS done at UCSF maybe two years ago. Overall, it was
fine. The worst thing was probably that you have to drink a
whole lot of water before the procedure and you can’t go to the
bathroom. It can get a little uncomfortable holding a full
bladder until the test is over. There was a little cramping
afterwards, but nothing out of the ordinary. There are two
ways to get a sample. For us they went through the abdomen.
They use a long needle to get the sample, so hopefully you’re
not too squeamish about that. Oh, and once the needle is in,
they do a little pumping action with the needle, almost like
they are trying to stab the sample with the end of the needle.
That was a little unexpected.
I've had both amnio (once) & cvs twice (both thru abdomen &
cervix). I found the trans-cervical cvs much easier than
amnio. The trans-abdomnial cvs was a bit more painful. I had
mine done with Dr. Goldberg at CPMC but I know women who have
had them at UCSF. I had good experiences at CPMC and would go
back.
good luck
I had my CVS at UCSF with Dr. Mary Norton in February 2005. I'm
35, and I was 11 and 1/2 weeks pregnant. It was as positive an
experience as I could have possibly hoped for, and I highly
recommend their office. The office staff was great, the
ultrasound tech called my baby ''photogenic,'' and Dr. Norton was
reassuring and extremely competent. The actual procedure (mine
was transabdominal) was over very quickly with just a few seconds
of minimal cramping, and my recovery was easy. It was just not
that big of a deal; the worrying beforehand was far worse. Also,
the results came faster than I had expected, which was nice, and
they were a-okay, which was even nicer!
Originally my OB referred me to a doctor in Oakland who does
I had the CVS at UCSF with Mary Norton in April this year. It
was an altogether excellent medical experience. The staff were
very supportive and put us at ease with their enthusiasm over
the ultrasounds and their full explanations of what would
happen. The procedure itself was much less painful than I
imagined - it was over very quickly and was nowhere near worth
the nervous anticipation I had built up. They were very prompt
too with the follow-up call to let us know everything was OK.
If you want more detail, feel free to contact me direct:
helen
I had my CVS done at Cal Pacific, not UCSF, but I think they
are probably pretty similar--both very advanced, experienced
and safe. I was a month shy of 40 when I delivered (a healthy
boy) so I can relate to your trepidation. My experience with
CVS was so positive that I would highly recommend it. It was
fast and simple and as painless as a pap smear. They go in
either vaginally or abdominally, depending on the position of
the fetus, so you probably won't know ahead of time which way
they'll do it. Mine was vaginal which seemed less scary to me,
but I have friends who've had it done abdominally with no
problems also. The biggest surprise for me was that it gave me
an absolutely amazing view of my baby--I didn't realize that
I'd be able to see anything so I didn't even tell my husband to
come, and in hindsight that is my biggest regret. It was far
better than the later ultrasound images because at that early
stage the baby is so tiny that he fits in one frame so you get
a really great picture. My little guy was gulping water and
waving his arm, and that's when I fell in love! And I had the
results in less than two weeks, so I knew by week 13 that all
was okay (except I think spina bifida, which I believe is the
one thing it can't test for--I decided not to worry about that
one because I was very good about taking folic acid). I did
not bother having an amnio, which was a big relief, so I was
really able to enjoy my pregnancy instead of worrying (like I
know I would have) for the 18 weeks or whatever it is until you
can have an amnio.
Anyway, what I thought might be a scary experience turned out
to be one of the highlights of my pregnancy, so try to relax,
bring your partner, and hopefully enjoy the show.
best of luck!
anon
Your post brought back a lot of memories. My husband and
I struggled with the amnio and CVS decision when I was
pregnant with our daughter a couple of years ago. We went
through genetic counseling at UCSF because my fertility
doctor suggested it. He thought it would be a good idea
because I was 41 years old. The doctors and staff were fine
but I found the whole thing to be pretty upsetting. I was
finally pregnant and here were all these people looking for
trouble! : )
After a lot of reading and soul searching I decided I could
not do anything that might put the pregnancy at risk. I chose
to not do either the amnio or the CVS. Instead I decided that
the nuchal translucency screening would provide me with
enough information. The NT is an ultrasound similar to
those at regular prenatal exams only it is longer and more
detailed. It is done between 11 and 14 weeks. I believe
they do measurements of the neck that might indicate a
higher risk for Downs syndrome. I believe they look for other
abnormalities as well. So far it appears that the NT
screening poses no risk to the fetus. Some women do the
NT screening first and then decide whether or not to do the
amnio or CVS based on the NT results.
I understand your worries about having a baby later in life
and you need to do whatever you feel is best. In addition to
finding out as much as you can about the procedure itself I
would also think about why you want to do the CVS and what
you are going to do if the result indicates a problem. Is
there a family history of serious birth defects or Downs
syndrome? Has your OB given you reason to believe the
pregnancy isn't going well? Will you terminate the
pregnancy if the test results tell you your baby might have
something wrong? For me the answer was no to all three
questions - so what was the point? I think there should be a
really good reason for undergoing an invasive procedure
that puts the pregnancy at risk. I don't care if the risk is only
1% or 3% or whatever. I don't feel being 40 years old is a
good enough reason by itself.
Don't get me wrong - I appreciate all that modern medicine
has to offer and I have no complaints about UCSF. I chose
a hospital birth with epidural without hesitation. But I think
that at times modern medicine interferes unecessarily.
Might that be the case with you? You don't mention any
other concern about the pregnancy other than your age. You
have good reason to be nervous. Listen to that voice inside
you that is questioning this. Don't let doctors or anyone else
talk you into something you might not want or need.
Best wishes, good luck, and congratulations from -
another mom of advanced maternal age
i had a cvs done at ucsf when i was pregnant with my first 4
years ago. i believe i was 10 weeks pregnant. i went to great
lengths to get my insurance to cover the procedure there
(which initially they were not going to do) because i had
heard that at that time thery were the best and did the
highest number of cvs testing. when i had the procedure
they had a very difficult time getting what they needed
because my placenta was in the way (but not in any sort of
risky/pregnancy complication place.) they did try, which was
very painful. unfortunately, they had to stop without getting
the sample they needed. i had to act as if i had the test done
and take it easy for the next few days. when i went back a
week later i was very nervous that they wouldn't be able to
do the procedure and it would be another painful experience
for nothing. this time they had the head of the department
perform the procedure and it went very smoothly - no pain at
all. this is what most women experience, but i wanted to let
you know of my unusual situation. of course it was all worth
it because we had a healthy baby girl.
feel free to contact me directly if you'd like. best of luck.
emily
April 2002
Has anyone had a CVS with Dr Weiss at East Bay Perinatal? I understand that
the experience level of the doctor is really important with this test. They
told me he is very experienced but didn't give me any specifics to go on.
Thanks
Recommendations received:
Jim Goldberg California Pacific Medical Center
October 2004
I am considering whether to have a CVS test done and the posts
in the Advice section seem to be dated and focused on doctors
outside the Kaiser system. I am a Kaiser Oakland patient and
over-35. I would like to know whether anyone has had a CVS done
recently through Kaiser Oakland and what was their experience.
Specifically, how did you set up the test (e.g., did you talk to
your OB about it and get referred to someone else), how long did
the results take, and were you happy with the test. Since
Kaiser is such a bureaucracy, some advice on navigating through
this system would be helpful.
Expecting
My CVS was in January 2003 at California Pacific in S.F. with
Dr. Jim Goldberg. He is considered the best in the Bay Area and
is a pioneer in the field of CVS--I had three miscarriages
before this pregnancy and my OB said she wouldn't send me (or
any of her patients) to anyone else. His miscarriage rate is
less than 1%. I was very nervous about the procedure, but he had
a reassuring bedside manner and it went remarkably quickly. It
barey hurt--just for a second. By the time my brain registered
the discomfort of the needle entry (I had it through the
stomach) the pain was already over.
You need to find out how long your doctor has been doing CVS and
what his/her personal rate of miscarriage is. But if it's
possible for you, I would seriously consider doing it with
Goldberg. And call for an appointment immediately--I called as
soon as I knew I was pregnant.
Finally, a question: How old are you? I was 41 when I was
pregnant and even then the chances are only 3% that a baby would
have, say, Down Syndrome. CVS isn't generally considered for
women under 38 or 39. If you're concerned about Down Syndrome,
you can get a nuchal fold screening which is entirely non-
invasive and pretty accurate. Also, CVS doesn't screen for tubal
defects--you'll have to get a blood test later for those. If you
have a specific risk for chromosomal abnormality, however, CVS
is a good choice, especially if you know you would terminate.
Finding out about the chromosomes so early in the pregnancy was
a relief. And waiting for amnio if you're at high risk can be
traumatic since you're generally feeling life by then.
Good luck and congratulations. Becoming a Mom at this age is
amazing.
Happy Old Lady Mom
I'm 39 and I just had a CVS test throught Kaiser Oakland, and I
recommend with without reservations. I think my doctor made the
referral to the Genetics department, then someone called me and
sceduled it for me. If you have questions about the test,
procedures or risks, I would call the Oakland Genetics Dept.
they are really helpful and will explain things better and with
more patience than the Obg's seem to. They only do the
procedure at the SF and San Jose Kaiser facilities, which means
that those doctors have a lot of expereince with them. My test
was done like an amniocentesis, with a neddle thru your belly,
but depending on where the placenta is attached they may do it
vaginally. You won't know until the day of the procedure how
yours will be done. You have to have the test done between 10-
12 weeks and the doctor will confirm the date before he does
the test, you may be denied the test if you are not in the
correct weeks of pregnancy. The procedure itself took very
little time, but it is not very pleasant, since you have a
large neddle in you, but when it's over, you should feel fine.
(unless you are like me and wanted to pass out because you hate
neddles..) You will get results back in 2 weeks, just like an
amnio. I'm realy glad I did the test, because you have results
about 1.5 months before you would with an amnio. My
understanding is that this test is done ''all the time'' in SF,
but we in the East Bay tend to do more amnio's - but who knows
if that is true. Good luck.
thumbtak
Feb 2004
Has anyone had this diagnosis resulting from a CVS? Did you go
on to do BOTH an amnio and a PUBS test? What was/were the
outcome of the tests, and what was the outcome with the baby?
We'd appreciate any advice, consolation of comfort that anyone
can offer. The doctors seem to have limited info.
My baby had this result on amnio, and at 2 years old she has
absolutely no sign of any problems. None. In fact she is very
advanced in a lot of the developmental skills. (n.b. I did not
have CVS).
I can completely relate to how nervewracking this is for you,
and I would recommend doing whatever it takes to help ease your
mind. I had my amnio done at CPMC, and the genetic counselor
there told me that the main issue with this kind of result is
that they are worried about heart problems. So I did a ''level
3''(?) ultrasound at 22 weeks to ensure that there were no
visible heart defects, and that was very reassuring for me. At
that time the doctor told me not to worry, and that the result
was probably ''an artifact'' (possibly meaning that the sample was
contaminated, or that the mutation occurred in the lab). He
also told me that ''lots of babies with this result grow up to be
college professors''.
The odds are with you!
Dear Anon, your message brings back painful memories of my second
pregnancy, but the short result is that our son was born perfectly healthy... we
just had to live through some very anxious months to get there. Our amnio
came back with trisomy 8 psuedo-mosaicism: only a very few cells had the
abnormality. I was terrified and insisted on doing all of the testing available: a
second ultrasound, a second amnio and a PUBS test. I think I would do the
same again except that I would not do the PUBS. At the time I had it (Dec.
1999) it still seemed very experimental and not well controlled. The doctors
spent ages trying to decide where to insert the needle so it would hit the cord.
If I had realized that the test was that difficult to perform, I wouldn't have gone
through with it. As it happened, in our case, the trisomy seems to have been
an artifact introduced perhaps from the placenta during the initial amnio.
I'm sending you lots of good thoughts for a thorough process with results as
definitive as they can make them. We had excellent care through the Alta Bates
network for all of this. When it was all over, I went out and got myself a
midwife so I could experience the less technological aspect of my pregnancy.
Take care and feel free to send me e-mail if you want a shoulder.
Heather
I am very sorry about your diagnosis. I have not had that
issue but have dealt with a different chromosonal problem
diagnosed by CVS. I found talking with a variety of genetics
counselors to be helpful. Not sure what your time frame is but
basic karotyping on you and the baby's father can be done in a
week or two. Please email me if you would like more
information. I would also highly reccomend
the doctor I went through this with.
Take Care
What was your experience with the CVS test?
July 2000
I would like to hear from people who have had the CVS Test.
I am told good things about it since you can take it early
in the pregnancy, but at the same time, I am reticent since
I've had a miscarriage before (first trimester still makes
me nervous). I've had a healthy baby since, and I'm told
there's no greater risk for me. I'm also concerned about
how it feels and the level of discomfort. I am 35 and healthy
(other than feeling queasy every day from being pregnant)
and am planning on taking this, so any reassurance would be
welcome.
I've had both CVS and amniocentisis, and CVS was far and away
easier and less painful (although neither were extremely
difficult or painful). I experienced some serious cramping
during the amnio, but the CVS was over almost before I knew
it had started, and I felt virtually nothing - maybe a little
pressure. My memory is that the actual procedure (minus prep
time) lasted less than a minute. (Although it was more than
two years ago at this point, so my memory might be glossing
things over a bit by now.) I think my doctor was very
experienced and was particularly efficient, so he might have
been a little better than most.
At the time, we really sweated the decision of whether to do
the CVS or not, given the SLIGHTLY increased chance of
miscarriage, but we had other overriding motivating factors
to do it, so we went ahead, and had zero complications, very
quick results, and now a beautiful, healthy, happy 18-month-old.
Good luck, I'm sure you'll be in good hands.
elaine
I had CVS at 11 weeks and it was great. Minimal if any
discomfort. Mine was done through my stomach rather than
vaginally so I bruised a bit, but other than that no problem.
I also had an early miscarriage two years earlier, but after
weighing the pros and cons it was more important for me to
have results early (I was 37 at the time). I had mine done
at UCSF-Stanford by Jim Goldberg sp? I would definitely do it
again if I decide to have a second child. Good luck.
I had a CVS test before my daughter was born. She's now
20 months and healthy, happy and beautiful. I also had
concerns about the risks of getting the test, both since it
was so early and because it requires taking a sample of the
chorionic villi (actual tissue close to the embryo, rather
than just the amniotic fluid with the amniocentesis
procedure). We got some really wonderful counseling from
the people at the California Pacific Medical Center, where
we had the procedure done, and then the procedure went extremely
smoothly. I was also 35 and right on the bubble as far as
comfort. We were told that the reason women 35 or older are
recommended to have genetic testing is that the statistical
risk of miscarriage due to the CVS procedure itself by then
is either equal to or less than the chance of natural miscarriage.
And as you get older, the risks of natural miscarriage increase
more so than the risks of the test, so it's statistically
less risky to have the test. I imagine since you're considering
the test at all that you and your partner may want an opportunity
to make decisions should you need to. I think the fact that you
can get the CVS test between 7 and 12 weeks, vs. after 15 weeks
with amniocentesis, gives you the time to make those decisions
when you are still in your first trimester. More likely than
not you won't be faced with a difficult choice, but my experience
with the CVS (as well as several other women our age who had
CVS tests) was very positive. Hope this helps.
Gretchen
I had CVS five years ago when I was pregnant with my
second child. I too had miscarried before (twice) and
was naturally concerned about that. I did quite a bit
of research on CVS vs Amnio. What I found out then
(you might want to check out if it is still true
today) is that the miscarriage rate greatly depended
on the Dr. who does the procedure. The only Dr. at
the time who was doing the procedure in the EAst Bay
was with the team who pioneered it in SF. Her name
escapes me now but it is an Asian name. Her
miscarriage rate on CVS was actually lower than the
rate of miscarriage on Amnio.
As far as the pain, etc. associated with CVS; yes it
was very uncomfortable, and yes afterwards you are
pretty exhausted by it, some women have pain
afterwards, I did not. Either way I feel that knowing
the results of the test so quickly was well worth it.
I am sure you know this but make sure you do the test
10 1/2 weeks through 12 weeks.
Good Luck
I had an amnio for my first daughter and a CVS for the second.
No comparison. The CVS seemed less risky, less invasive, took
less time, I could see what was going on by watching the same
monitor as the doctor. If you are having this done locally there
is an amazing doctor through Alta Bates, I think -- Dr. Cheu
(probably misspelling that) who does them all the time and is well-respected. Do the CVS, I say.
I had three Chorionic Villus Sampling tests, two through the
cervix and one "transabdominally". All 3 were relatively
painless with just once some cramping afterward that worried
me but which was perfectly normal. I have Kaiser coverage
and was very impressed with their doctors and good record with
CVSs. The worst part is having to have a full bladder-this gets
very uncomfortable if there's any delay! They let me pee out
some (a line on a cup) but still!!! Ugh. Do take someone along
to drive you home. You will want a little "babying" afterward.
I was able to have my then 2 yr old son along once even though
the paperwork said I couldn't. The dr was fine with it.
I got bad news from the second test and I'd like to tell people
who are considering the CVS over Amniocentesis that I feel I was
so much better off emotionally and had less to deal with
physically too than those who found they had to terminate
after the latter test. The tiny difference between the two tests
in the chance of the CVS causing a miscarriage (and some of that
difference could be miscarriages that would have happened anyway)
was way worth it to me. It was still heartbreaking and one of my
life's most difficult occurances, but in the group I attended later
I saw far greater devastation in those who chose amniocentesis.
And when the news is good-you have so many fewer weeks to worry!
The stories about CVS causing limb abnormalities are still
circulating when I think those occured in only one hospital which
was doing the tests earlier than they are routinely done now.
I was a bit disgusted with the medical people who warned me off CVS
still based on outdated research when the success rates are truly
great and the benefits also so tremendous. Best of luck to you-I
also suffered a miscarriage (before I got to do a CVS) in between
my two kids and know how sad that is. Be brave and know that you
can handle all that life brings.
Regarding CVS I had one done at California Pacific Medical
Center in SF in Nov 99. The test itself was relatively
painless in my case, something like a pelvic exam. We
chose to do CVS because it could be performed earlier (the
test done in the 12th week) and the genetic counselor
explained that the risk for CVS was about the same as for
amnio. The only risk factor we had was maternal age, as
I was 37 at the time. I had also experienced a
1st-trimester miscarriage some years ago and was nervous
about complications and getting through the 1st trimester,
but everything went fine in my case. We now have a
beautifully healthy 2.5 month old boy. From my experience,
I would recommend CVS, especially if you might consider
terminating the pregnancy should a problem be found. This
is the reason we were interested in doing a test as early
as possible. Hope this helps.
Rachel
I had a CVS test w/this pregancy at 10 weeks (I'm currently
31 weeks). It was quite painless - a little bit of discomfort
- really just discomfort, not the "discomfort" that translates
into "extreme pain" w/doctors & dentists. I have a very low
threshold for pain & I was fine. I was told to rest for three
days after - meaning not do anything strenous or out of the
ordinary. The peace of mind that came w/the results were worth
it for us.
L
I had a CVS procedure last Sept at the Alta Bates Perinatal
Center on Telegraph and thought the Staff was remarkable at
treating patients like human beings (a rare thing these days).
They were super professional, explaining everything clearly
and taking the time to answer questions. Dr. Chuey, who
trained with CVS guru Dr. Goldeberg at UCSF, did the procedure.
I believe she is the one who does all the CVS for patients who
come from the Alta Bates Fertility Clinic (after trying to
conceive for several years, I was glad to be in the hands of a
doc with a stellar track record at doing CVS). The most
discomfort from the procedure came from having to drink a lot
of water (you need a really full bladder for proper ultrasound
imaging). The route of entry for the needle was trans-abdominal
(as opposed to trans-cervical which is sometimes required,
depending on the point of attachment of the amniotic sac
vis-a-vis your uterus) and it required a subcutaneous lidocaine
shot which felt like a small bee sting for just a couple of
seconds. The CVS needle looks gnarly but I did not feel any
pain whatsoever, just a minor tugging as the tissue sample was
being taken. Feel free to e-mail me if you have more questions...
and congratulations on your pregnancy!
Caroline
I had prenatal genetic testing for my three children due to
advanced maternal age - amnios for the first two mainly because
I had a miscarriage beforehand. The third pregnancy was six
years later when I was 43, so I chose the CVS. I figured it
was sufficiently far from the miscarriage and I had had
children in the meantime. It was fine and we knew the results
earlier which gave us great peace of mind. Good luck on your
decision.
At 42, for my first baby, I had a CVS test at 10 or 11 weeks
at UCSF, which was easy and the results came quickly. For my
second child, they found an incipient twin in the pre-CVS
sonogram, so I was referred instead for amnio. There's a
doctor at UCDavis who does amnios at 12 weeks with great
success (I was referred by a neighbor who worked at Childrens
Hospital; he began to do it when he got moms from the surrounding mountains who didn't come
back for later amnios, and his
published results match any later amnio program).
Go for experience. The more CVS's or amnios a doctor has done,
the better your results (and the lower your miscarriage rate).
Miscarriage rates 12 years ago when I had CVS were very low (2.5%).
Don't worry.
Amnio vs. CVS
Nov 1999
Does anyone have any advice about the benefits and/or disadvantages
of an amniocentesis as compared to Chorionic Villus Sampling. I'm
tempted to get the CVS, but I've never talked to anyone who'se gone
throught the procedure. I've heard it has a slightly larger risk
procedure. I've heard its has a slightly larger risk of miscarriage
and that in the older CVS tests there was also a slight risk of limb
deformities. I'm wondering if that's still the case.
(Also see comments about CVS in Amnio after low AFP result)
I would highly recommend the CVS procedure having done it with my first
child. Now that I am pregnant again, I plan to have another CVS test.
The test can be done at Week 10-12, with results available in 2 days, as
opposed to Week 16 for Amnio with a two-week wait for results. So with CVS
you will have the same very important information as much as eight weeks
earlier in your pregnancy. That's a big advantage in my book. As far as the
procedure itself goes, I found it to be about on par with a pelvic exam in
terms of physical discomfort, i.e. very little. The doctor asked me if I would
object to having a couple of doctors observe my procedure, which was a little
weird but I said okay. My husband was also able to observe.
As far as risk of miscarriage, my OB/GYN had explained to me that the
risk was maybe 1 in 100 for CVS versus 1 in 200 for amnio. Since I was
referred to a very experienced doc who had pioneered the use of CVS, I felt
comfortable in his care. The risk of limb deformities, as I recall, was
attributed to inexperienced practitioners and isolated at a few centers
where the procedure was done early on, so again, make sure your doctor refers
you to someone who is very experienced. Good luck!!
I am 7.5 months pregnant and did CVS at 10 or 11 weeks and had a very
positive experience. I am 36 years old and chose CVS because it gave me
data a lot earlier than the amnio and miscarriage rate for the doctor I
used was about the same as amnio. I, too, was worried about the
higher miscarriage risk, but Dr. Chui (I think that was her name)
has a good reputation and her rates are comparable to amnio...
apparently it really varies by individual doctor. I think she is one
of the only doctors in the East Bay who does CVS; there others are in the
city. For me it was a really simple procedure, only mildly more uncomfortable
than a prolonged pap smear. I had it done transcervically, but they also
do it transabdominally... it all depends on where the palcenta is located.
It is obviously, a really personal decision, but it really worked for me,
and I was glad to have the data earlier in my pregnancy.
Good luck with your decision.
I recommend the amnio over the CVS. I've done it both ways and consider
the amnio far less "invasive". Both of these procedures took place at the
same Alta Bates facility, but the need for an actual "tissue" sample for the
CVS required a second (!) try, whereas the amnio was successful on the first
attempt. For me, the amnio hurt less and was less "dramatic" than the
CVS. The only true advantage I can see for the CVS was an earlier test
date... but I can't recommend it. Hope this helps.
I had a transabdominal (I think that's the term - through my belly
rather than my cervix) CVS at 12 weeks, and I was told that while the
risk of miscarriage after the procedure is about 1% (while with amnio
it's about 0.5%), at Alta Bates, because they do a lot of them, the
risk of miscarriage is somewhat lower, although still slightly higher than
with an amniocentesis. I chose the CVS because I wanted to have any
bad news as early in my pregnancy as possible and I felt the risk was
worth it.
My doctor never mentioned anything about any risk of deformity with
the CVS, nor did any of the educational materials I read mention this.
You'll just need to get informed and make a decision-there isn't
really a wrong choice here.
I just had a CVS in October, and it was a piece of cake. I was so
captivated by watching the fetus dancing on the ultrasound, that I
forgot to be afraid! The important thing, according to my OB is to have a
really experienced doctor perform the procedure. I'm part of Health Net's
Alta Bates Medical Group, and the very experienced CVS doctor at the
Perimatal Center quit a week before I went in for genetic counseling. Health
Net was able to negotiate a contract with California Pacific Medical Center
(CPMC) in SF, and I had Dr Goldberg perform the procedure at 10 weeks. He has
been doing CVSs for 10 years, and their miscarriage rate is the same as the
amnio national average (1 in 200). The missing finger/toes syndorm
happened a lot in the early years of CVS when they performed CVSs at 5-7 weeks
(sometimes the needle would cut off the blood supply to the fetus). By
doing a CVS at 10 weeks, this deformity is (usually?) avoided.
It's a very personal decision, but as a 40 year old single parent to
be, I knew I had a higher chance of having a Down's baby and,being alone,
that was moreof a challenge than I wanted to take on.For peace of mind, I
wanted the test results as early as possible, in case I decided on an
abortion, so that's why I ruled out an amnio (which can't be performed until
14 weeks and it can take two weeks to get the results). At CPMC I had the
results in one week. One thing, with CVS you don't find out about neural tube
defects, but most OBs have you take a AFP blood test at 16 weeks, so you can
find that out later. You can also find out the child's gender with CVS, but
I decided I wanted to be surprised!
I had a hard time getting pregnant (1-1/2 years on different fertility
drugs), and until I had my CVS results AND passed my first trimester,
I protected myself by distancing myself from the pregancy. After 13
weeks, I celebrated, and I feel so excited now!
Good luck with making your decision!
I have done both and found the CVS to be an easier procedure and the results
come back faster. If you are going through Dr. Cheue (if that's how
you spell her name) she is as experienced with CVS as she is with
Amnio, so the risk would be very minimal. Good luck!
I had CVS, after much debate and research. If I remember correctly, the
risk of deformities is now almost non existent, and the miscarriage risk
is the same as amnio. I had mine done at UCSF, which is one of the best in
the country, or so I had heard, and had an excellent experience. I was
very impressed with the caring and care of the staff, and surprised that
it wasn't a more painful procedure. For me anyway, it was uncomfortable
but not really painful, and fairly quick. Depending on how the baby is
positioned, they either go in through the vagina or the top of the
abdomen. I had the abdomen approach. I stayed home and took it easy
for a day, and felt some very mild cramping, but nothing more. I personally
preferred the ability to have it done early (rather than amnio which is
much later), and was very pleased with the decision. Good luck!
I had CVS instead of amnio because I was concerned about how late I
would find out the results from amnio (well into the second
trimester). I knew a woman who had amnio, discovered her child
had a very severe genetic defect (trisomy-13) quite late in the
pregnancy, and felt she was rushed into having an abortion
because they were pushing the allowable time limit. She wanted
to have time to grieve and consider the issue from all sides.
After that she always had CVS.
The key is finding out the miscarriage rate of your particular
provider. I had a woman at the Alta Bates Perinatal Center do
the CVS (I forget her name but think she's the only one there);
she does them fairly frequently, is very experienced, and has
a very low miscarriage rate.
The study that talked about the risk of limb deformities was done
some years ago when they used to do the CVS much earlier than they
do it now. Apparently with the fetal ages they use now, there's
neglible risk.
Also, I had an amnio for my first child, and the CVS was even
less painful than the amnio! I just felt tired for 24 hours and
stayed mostly in bed.
Good luck! It was such a relief to get the good news from the
CVS. It eased my worry much earlier than the amnio would have;
I'm really glad to have made that decision.
Home |
Reviews |
Advice |
Members |
Post a Message
Join BPN |
Help |
What's New |
Search |
Contact Us
Last updated: Oct 20, 2007
Copyright © 1996-2008 Berkeley Parents Network
The opinions and statements expressed on this website
are those of parents who subscribe to the
Berkeley Parents Network. Please see
Disclaimer & Usage for
information about using content on this website.